Where should be the real development of Indian Society?

I found a particularly interesting question on Quora

"How much money should i have to adopt a village and develop it?"

to which I answered this

"First you need money to lobby every government bureaucrat of the village to get licenses, no objection certificate, consent ruling party & opposition party of Panchayat, majority, minority, etc. When you finished with that and if you got left with any money, you can go for development. Please note now you only got Permission to do development. 

Now get ready for the Real game of development. Where you decide on which aspect you need development, you have to go for formalities all over again with of course lobbying.And by the time you finished doing this, you have no money to even feed your self. 
Congratulations! You lost all money and done nothing but fed bureaucrats. This is India you cannot adopt a village with only money. If you want to do some good Educate the people of your village the development will follow on its own. Spend all of your money on educating them. Making roads, hospitals and drinking water is all secondary. If you don't have money educate them yourself that would do some people good."

I mean when talking about development why do everyone only sees infrastructure, which makes the lives easy and why don't everyone concentrates on Education. An Educated Citizenry can bring out development on their own. If you arrange states on the basis of literacy rate, you will find that there is always more sustainable uniform level of development where the literacy rates are higher. I am not talking about metro cities like Chennai, Mumbai, Bangalore etc but talking about overall development of the state or the country not just a particular area or city.

A sustainable development is the only thing that matters because it does not deteriorates with time but it increase as the people living in it becomes more educated. The education lays the foundation of development and not the infrastructure. And it is the lowest cost for development to be paid because educated citizenry will be more productive and more inclined towards social values.

Why do most of Indian Men lives with their parents?

Does adulthood means leaving your parents and go to live alone? This might be a social norm in many countries but not in India. In a survey conducted by Shaadi.com where 3,952 single men participated it was found that 54.3 % wants to stay with their parents post marriage on the other hand when 4,617 women when survey the majority wanted the other wise about 64.7%.

The Indian concept of joint family has its own pros and cons but in Indian society it is the sons duty to take care of his parents. It is not the matter of choice but it is expected. The idea goes like this'I took care of you when you were young and now you take care of me when I am old.' It is as simple as that. Most of the Indian parent use their financial strength to educate their children thinking they will take care of them if they become financially strong.

Most important thing which encourages Indian Men to live with their parents even if their financial strength is high enough to support him and his parents separately is the moral support they get from their parents, homely food and child support if they are married. The Indian married couples find it easy and assuring when the grandparents are taking care of their children when they are not at home. But sometimes this interferes with the development of the child because the grandparents raise their child in the way they see fit to which they or us might not agree with like overprotection, teaching them old values etc.

Living with parents is a common trend in India and its a social norm and nothing is weird about it. Even though their is very little privacy in living with parents but has its own perks too. The dinner table is always lively with at least four people couple and grooms parents but it is rarely seen where the brides and grooms parents living together. But their are instances where the groom stays with the parents of the bride in their house, this concept is called in India 'Ghar Jamai'.

It is expected in India and taught that it is expected to return home after college and even young generations thinks so too. Why only normal middle class family but also upper class lives with their family too. Like actors, Buisnessmen etc.

So non-Indian girls if you mayry an Indian man then you have to think about moving in with his parents where you get parental love as well as moral support with a little compromise on privacy and personal freedom. But personally I think it is worth the price.

How to become a billionaire?

If you think about it, then there is simple way to become a billionaire because if you figure out anything that can make every human on earth is willing to pay and such that it is never to costly rather say it is very cheap such that anybody will pay. Lets say one cent each from every person living on earth irrespective of age will instantly get you into the billionaire list.

The problem is the mechanism of collection and to produce something wanted by everyone. Today most of the billionaires in the world are in the software productions companies. Because software is produced from scratch and can be sold without much of a hassle. think about Facebook, Google, Twitter, Whatsapp etc.

What do they share in common? Yes, you are right. They have huge user-base, that means they are following the same thing which I mentioned in the beginning. They are built from the people all around the world. The billionaires today was at some point in the past was normal people with normal income just like you and me all they were was a little bit different in thinking. If you are able to create/think something like them then you are already billionaire by vision.

And remember only those can become rich who have a dream and persistence to make it into reality i.e vision which outreaches the current limitations.

Why Tony Stark quit being a iron man at the end of the IRON MAN 3 ?

The movie showcases Tony Stark's endeavor for finding what is he without the suit. It is his personal retrospection back to his root of being a mechanic and inventor. 

Toby build the suit to empower him so that he can proctect himself and showcase his abilities. He made clear that he is and will be Iron Man not because he feels responsibility of having power to protect but to boast about it. Now he realize the suit is not invincible, he realized the limit of his suit and his own mortality. He realized (through the event in the Avengers) even with his suit, he could be vulnerable. And to combat this feeling of vulnerability, he got obsessed with building more suits, improving its features. It's the logical choice, when you're under attack, the first thing you do is reinforce your defences. And in the process, he's no longer the Ironman. He let the suit become his cocoon. It provided a safe haven, but also separated him not only from the people he love and care about (Pepper), but also his own root of being a creative builder. He creates things, that's his ultimate strength. But the suit and his own fear caged that creativity. 

So through the movie, Tony was stripped his high-tech lab, his suit, his money, he had to rely on home depot items and build things in a motel room. Yet, he succeeded in discovering the truth behind the Mandarin. That empowered him, make him realize his real strength. 

Tony destroyed all his old suits as a declaration of his own inner strength. He's not afraid any more. He knew what he wants to do, and he doesn't need those suits to protect him anymore. 

In the end, Tony realize he's not just Ironman, he's a lot more than a piece of shining suit.

"And so, as Christmas morning began,my journey had reached its end.You start with something pure, something exciting Then come the mistakes The compromises We create our own demons. Of course, there are people who say progress is dangerous. But I'll bet none of those idiots ever had to live with a chest full of shrapnel. And now... neither will I.

So if I were to wrap this up tight with a bow or whatever, I guess I'd say my armor was never a distraction or a hobby. It was a cocoon. And now, I'm a changed man. You can take away my house, All my tricks and toys One thing you can't take away...I am Iron Man."

Cute Wanderer in the Desert 'Desert Fennec Fox.'

This cute little thing is called Deseret Fennec Fox which is the smallest fox in the world weighing 2 to 3 pounds and 9-16 inches long. They have unusually oversized ears to regulate the body temperature during daytime and have thick fur which is creamy colour which deflects heat during the day and keeps them warm during cold frigid nights in the Desert. Fennec foxes are common throughout the Sahara Desert and can also be found in the deserts of Northern Africa and Northern Sinai.

Fennel foxes make a variety of sounds like barking, a purring sound similar to that of a domestic cat, and a snarl if threatened. Fennec foxes are social animals that mate for life, with each pair or family controlling their own territory. The species usually breeds only once each year. Following mating, the male becomes very aggressive and protective of the female, providing her with food during her pregnancy and lactation periods. When born, the kit's ears are folded over and its eyes are closed, with the eyes opening at around ten days and the ears lifting soon afterwards. The life span of a Fennec fox has been recorded as up to 14 years in captivity.

A fennec fox's typical den is dug in sand, either in open areas or places sheltered by plants with stable sand dunes considered to be their ideal habitat. In compacted soils, dens can be up to 120 square meters, with up to 15 different entrances. In some cases different families interconnect their dens, or locate them close together. In soft, looser sand, dens tend to be simpler with only one entrance leading to a single chamber.

Fennec foxes' diets include lizards, birds and bird eggs, rodents and also vegetation such as berries.

Do Hearts have real Memories?

There are two kinds of medical death of a human body accepted by the law, one is brain death where the activity of the human brain ceases and second when the functioning of the heart stops. In both cases patients are considered dead.

It is a very debated topic that organs other than brain have memories in them. It kinda sounds similar to the game by Ubisoft's Assasins Creed in which memories are stored inside DNA. The Heart is second most vital organ in the human body. Do you think it has a place it humans memories and emotions biologically?

There have been perplexing reports of organ transplant receivers claiming that they seem to have inherited the memory, experiences and emotions of their deceased donors, causing  quirky changes in their personality. 

Cases of personality changes due to organ transplants.

Before we discuss the cases, it is pertinent to note that apart from miscellaneous information such as gender, age and cause of death, profiles of organ donors are traditionally kept concealed from their recipients for psychological reasons. The cases discussed here came to light after mysterious behavioural symptoms resulted in renunciation of the traditional donor-recipient anonymity.

Case 1: On May 29, 1988, an American woman named Claire Sylvia received a heart transplant at a hospital in Yale, Connecticut.  She was told that her donor was a eighteen-year old male from Maine, USA who had just died in a motorcycle accident.  Soon after the operation, Sylvia declared that she felt like drinking beer, something she wasn't particularly fond of.  Later, she observed an uncontrollable urge to eat chicken nuggets and found herself wanting to visit the popular chicken restaurant chain Kentucky Fried Chicken.  She also began craving for green peppers which  was something she hadn't particularly  liked before.  Sylvia also began having recurring dreams about a mystery man named Tim L., who she had a feeling was her donor.  On a cue from someone, she searched for obituaries in newspapers from Maine, and was able to identify the young man whose heart she had received.  His name had indeed been Tim.  After visiting Tim’s family, she discovered that he used to love chicken nuggets, green peppers and beer.  These experiences are documented in her book “A Change of Heart” by Claire Sylvia. 

Case 2: This story comes from an article in the Daily Mail.  William Sheridan, a retired catering manager with poor drawing skills, suddenly developed artistic talents after a heart transplant operation. He was amazed to discover that the man who donated his new heart had been a keen artist.

Case 3: A forty seven-year-old Caucasian male, who received a heart from an African-American teenager, was puzzled to find in himself a new-found taste for classical music.  He presumed that the donor must have liked rap music and dismissed the idea that the organ transplant had anything to do with his changed personality.  He was surprised to learn that the donor had been an avid violin player, and had died while clutching his violin case to his chest. 

Case 4: An eight-year-old girl, who received the heart of a ten-year-old girl who had been murdered, began having recurring vivid nightmares about the murder. Her mother arranged a consultation with a psychiatrist and after several sessions, the girl’s psychiatrist decided she was experiencing actual physical incidents.  They decided to call the police who used the detailed descriptions of the murderer given by the little girl to find and convict the man in question.

Critics deny the existence of proof that memories can be transplanted along with organs, and fear such assertions will cause donor numbers to fall. Some non-believers attribute personality changes in transplant recipients to the heavy drugs they must take to prevent organ rejection.

There are theories Proposed to understand this phenomena which is not widely accepted. Below video might help you to understand it.

The Unconscious Mind.

Many people are skeptical that such thing as the unconscious actually exists. Certainly, there is no way to physically grasp the unconscious but the clinical evidence in support of it speaks quite loudly. In fact, Freud discovered the unconscious at a time when he used hypnosis as a treatment modality with his patients.The unconscious mind is still viewed by many psychological scientists as the shadow of a “real” conscious mind, though there now exists substantial evidence that the unconscious is not identifiably less flexible, complex, controlling, deliberative, or action-oriented than is its counterpart.

Specifically, he discovered that he could plant a thought into his patient’s mind under hypnosis that the patient executed into an action after being released from the hypnotic state, having no recollection of the fact that Freud asked them to do the action in the first place. Instead, the patient fabricated an explanation and was convinced in its validity. Freud then realized that there must be a part of the patient’s mind where the thought he planted remained inaccessible or unconscious.

Believe it or not, the unconscious does exist and psychoanalytic practice, which has changed dramatically since its invention, has proven it over and over again throughout the years. The question is, do you want to know about your unconscious? Do you wish to have a deeper understanding of yourself and your actions?